But then something weird happened after reading both of them. It was like I was hungry, ate a meal, and then, after eating, I still didn't feel full. It was like I'd consumed empty calories. And not because I didn't like the books, because I did. No, it had something to do with the way I read them.
I couldn't figure out why I felt so unsatisfied, but then it came to me.
When you read a book you hold it, turn it over, see the cover sitting on your night stand, see a picture of the author - you live with it. The physical book itself becomes part of the experience. But that whole part of it is gone with an e-reader. Sure, you have a "Kindle" experience, but not a "book" experience. You read a story but you don't live with the story like you do when reading a book.
So you read and know you should be satisfied, but it doesn't stick to your ribs.
That said, I think I read faster precisely because of that very reason. I scarfed it down instead of savoring it like a good meal. It's also really easy to order a book so I've found I could buy a lot more books and instantly satisfy my craving for a particular title - which is a good thing for the industry. We need people buying more books. But I still wish they were books, and not e-books.
I've already ordered a bunch more e-books. Will be curious to see if I continue to feel the same way.
If you own an e-reader, what do you think of my analogy? Am I totally off base?
1 comment:
This is why I've never really bothered with looking into the whole e-book thing. I can understand the convenience of it but to me, like you said, I need to feel the book in my hands. I also love the excitement I get before stepping into a bookstore and the satisfaction I get when placing the book on my constantly growing shelf. To me, nothing can replace or even substitute a book in its original form.
Post a Comment